Why Netanyahu is wrong about Fatah-Hamas unity
“You can either have peace with Hamas or peace with Israel,” Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in a public statement Monday, hours after Abbas signed an agreement to form an interim government with Hamas ahead of Palestinian elections. The ultimatum, however, is fundamentally flawed; even if peace with Israel was around the corner, it would not be possible for the Palestinian president to reach a deal with Israel before mending ties with Hamas.
The only solution to the conflict currently on the table – although many others are lurking in the background – is the two-state solution, which by definition necessitates one unified Palestinian leadership. The goal of the two-state framework is the establishment of the State of Palestine, not two separate states in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
But there are other more important issues involved. Mahmoud Abbas is not Yasser Arafat. Abbas’s credibility on the Palestinian street has been consistently waning. Currently entering the seventh year of a four-year term as Palestinian Authority president, he lacks the authority, democratic or otherwise, to make concessions to Israel.
Secondly, the Arab Spring has moved into its second year; newly installed regimes are being tested for their commitment to the democratic ideas that galvanized entire nations to oust dictators, and tyrannical holdouts are slowly being forced out one by one. In these circumstances, neither Fatah nor Hamas can afford to further delay the long-overdue Palestinian elections. The Palestinian people have for some time been demanding democratic governance that reflects their will and the will of their national struggle for independence.
Lastly, even if a referendum is not ultimately necessary to implement a peace deal, in order for any such deal to hold even a modicum of legitimacy, it must be achieved by a democratically elected leader.
Under these circumstances, one could reasonably speculate that Netanyahu’s ultimatum to Abbas reflects the current Israeli government’s complete lack of interest in reaching a two-state solution. By arguing that Abbas’s government in the West Bank is the only party he is willing to make peace with, Netanyahu is saying one of two things: Either he believes the Israeli army can eradicate the Hamas movement with military means, a strategy that has failed for two decades, or he would rather perpetuate the status quo, in which the occupation continues, enabled by a somewhat autonomous, largely cooperative and mostly impotent Palestinian leadership.
|Print article||This entry was posted by Michael Omer-Man on February 7, 2012 at 3:44 am, and is filed under Israeli Politics, Palestinian Politics, Peace. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.|
No trackbacks yet.
about 3 months ago - No comments
Tzipi Livni, the only person in the soon-to-be-formed Israeli government who genuinely believes in the importance of the two-state peace process, splashed cold water on the prospect of it ever happening Tuesday. It’s time to start looking at alternative plans in case a two-state solution with the Palestinians proves impossible, she said. Speaking at the
about 3 months ago - No comments
At face value, the European Union heads of mission report on the Israeli settlement enterprise is a scathing indictment and call to action against Israel’s illegal settlement activities. In between the lines, however, the report reflects a frustration by European diplomats and bureaucrats at their own governments’ inaction. They are not implementing the existing legislation,
about 5 months ago - 1 comment
The following is an excerpt from a documentary detailing the tactics employed by Jewish settlers in Palestine: “When a new settlement is established, it must withstand attack from the very first day of occupation. A system of defense has been evolved, in which these experienced settlers play an important part. “When the proposed site has
about 6 months ago - No comments
One big problem with democracy — in most of its forms — is that leaders can be tempted to put their own re-election above the state’s civic and diplomatic interests. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s decision-making in recent days may be one of the finest examples of the phenomenon. Every Israeli government for the past
about 6 months ago - 1 comment
One of the responsibilities of the news media is to set the parameters of acceptable discourse in society. But while media outlets have the unique ability to demarcate what is and isn’t acceptable to print, in doing so, they walk a fine line and risk masking the ugliest – but real – faces of society.
about 7 months ago - 1 comment
There’s something different about the most recent flare-up between Israel and Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip. The Palestinians’ modus operandi appears to have changed, and Israel seems to be unsure of how to respond. In the past month, armed Palestinian groups in Gaza launched a string of three, seemingly well planned and ultimately successful
about 9 months ago - 1 comment
The story of how Israel reached the – real or perceived – brink of war with Iran is not exactly what it appears to be. At some point in recent years, Israeli decision-makers decided to play a game. Through a fairly innocuous and innocent lens, the game can be described as “good cop, bad cop.”
about 11 months ago - No comments
Nearly two decades have passed since the Oslo Accords first gave the world hope for Mideast peace and an end to Israeli rule over the Palestinian territories; in the West Bank, the failed framework for peace talks has become directly associated with the occupation itself. When hundreds of Palestinians took to the streets last week
about 1 year ago - No comments
Less than three weeks after at least 1,400 Palestinians in Israeli prisons launched a widespread hunger strike, Israeli Public Security Minister Yitzhak Aharonovitch on Thursday made several astounding admissions regarding Israel’s use of administrative detention. In private meetings with security officials, Aharonovitch called for reducing Israel’s use of the practice, applying it “only if there
about 1 year ago - No comments
This is the third and final part of a three-part series exploring alternatives to the two-state solution in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Part one examined attitudes and approaches to the one-state solution. Part two looked at the option of an Israeli-Palestinian federation. Prospects for a two-state resolution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict have dimmed in recent months